MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105900904 · doi:10.1109/tap.2010.2078440

Fast Solutions of the 2D Inverse Scattering Problem Based on a TSVD Approximation of the Internal Field for the Forward Model

2010· article· en· W2105900904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingular value decompositionComputationInversion (geology)Singular valueMultiplicative functionInverse problemInverse scattering problemMicrowave imagingApplied mathematicsAlgorithmMathematicsPermittivityMathematical optimizationComputer scienceMathematical analysisMicrowavePhysicsDielectricEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An alternative formulation of the microwave tomography problem is proposed, in order to reduce the computation time of the inversion procedure. The well-known multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method is used as reference algorithm. Our formulation is based on a truncated singular value decomposition of the matrix involved in the most computationally intensive operations of the inversion algorithm. After theoretical and practical investigation of the behavior of the singular values, it is shown that the corresponding approximation does not yield any significant degradation of the quality of the solutions even for large complex permittivity contrasts, while the computation times are reduced by a factor ranging between 1.1 and 6 with respect to the original method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it