MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105912971 · doi:10.1177/0022034514543016

Smad2 Overexpression Reduces the Proliferation of the Junctional Epithelium

2014· article· en· W2105912971 on OpenAlexafffund
Mazen K. Alotaibi, Yukiko Kitase, Charles F. Shuler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dental Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicKruppel-like factors research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsJunctional epitheliumEpitheliumCell biologyChemistryBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The overexpression of the intracellular signaling molecule of the transforming growth factor-beta family (TGF-β) Smad2 was found to induce apoptosis and inhibit the proliferation rate of oral epithelial cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate in vivo the effect of Smad2 overexpression on the proliferation rate of the junctional epithelium (JE). Smad2 overexpression was driven by the cytokeratin 14 promoter (K14-Smad2) in transgenic mice. The K14-Smad2 mice were compared with wild-type (WT) mice selected as the control group. Samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin stains and analyzed by image analysis. Immunohistochemistry was conducted for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and c-Myc as markers of cell proliferation. The expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (P15, P21, and P27) was determined by real-time polymerase chain-reaction (RT-PCR). The quantity of phosphorylated retinoblastoma (pRB) was determined with Western blots. The overexpression of Smad2 altered the area of the junctional epithelial cells in one-year-old K14-Smad2 mice. The area was 32,768 (± 3,473) μm(2) for the WT and 24,937.25 (± 1,965) μm(2) for the K14-Smad2 mice. There was a significant difference in the proliferation rates of the JE (PCNA-positive cells) between the WT and K14-Smad2 mice, 20.7% (± 1.1) and 2.1% (± 0.5), respectively. A significant difference in c-Myc expression occurred between experimental and control samples. The K14-Smad2 mice had a mean of 2.3% (± 0.6), and the WT mice had a mean of 20.1% (± 3.6). Smad2 overexpression up-regulated the mRNA expression of P15 by 2.3-fold and that of P27 by 5.5-fold in the K14-Smad2 mice. Finally, the pRB protein showed a 2.3 (± 0.5)-fold increase in K14-Smad2 mice when compared with WT mice. Smad2 overexpression inhibits the proliferation of JE cells by down-regulating c-Myc and up-regulating P15 and P27, which resulted in an increase in pRB, leading to cell-cycle arrest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dental ResearchSame topicKruppel-like factors researchFrench-language works237,207