Le rôle des communautés de pratique dans le développement de l’ambidextrie contextuelle : le cas GDF SUEZ
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution propose de voir les communautés de pratique pilotées comme un support à l’ambidextrie contextuelle. En présentant la capacité de ces structures à supporter des activités d’exploration et d’exploitation, nous montrons qu’elles satisfont aux hypothèses de l’ambidextrie contextuelle. Nous développons cette proposition à travers l’étude du réseau de communautés du groupe GDF SUEZ. Cette étude permet d’affiner notre compréhension des principaux aspects de l’ambidextrie contextuelle : un contexte favorisant tant la performance que le partage de connaissances, la gestion des tensions entre exploration et exploitation au niveau individuel et la capacité à combiner alignement et flexibilité sur l’ensemble d’une organisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it