Justicia en Conflicto y Conflictos sobre Justicia: el Derecho Internacional Penal en Tiempos de Altas Expectativas / Justice in Conflict and Conflicts about Justice: International Criminal Law in Times of High
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este ensayo se analizan algunos aspectos del contexto que marca el nacimiento de la jurisdiccion penal internacional permanente - la Corte Penal Internacional (CPI)- a saber, las expectativas que se colocaron en las instituciones de justicia penal internacional en los anos 90 y posteriores, y el fracaso parcial de estas instituciones para mantenerse a la altura de esas previsiones poco realistas. Posteriormente se abordan algunos elementos de consideracion para el futuro del sistema de justicia penal internacional. Se tratan algunos de los fundamentos sobre los que el sistema esta construido, sirviendo de base para el argumento de que a pesar de un legado mixto y diversas deficiencias, no habra marcha atras hacia un vacio legal en el Derecho internacional en lo relativo a la rendicion de cuentas por crimenes internacionales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".