Review: management of children with mental health problems by specialist teams in primary care improved some outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bower P, Garralda E, Kramer T , et al. The treatment of child and adolescent mental health problems in primary care: a systematic review. Fam Pract2001 Aug; 18 : 373 –82 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: What interventions are effective for treating mental health problems in children and adolescents in primary care? Studies were identified by searching Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register in August 1999; scanning the reference lists of relevant studies; and contacting 34 subject experts and authors of included studies. Studies were selected if they were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before and after studies, or before and after studies without controls and participants were ≤18 years of age and were treated in primary care for mental health problems. Data were extracted on design, study population, sample size, and results. Educational studies involving the primary care team: 8 studies (1 RCT) were included. The RCT compared an introduction to the use of behaviour modification techniques (12 sessions) with … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DFamily%2BPractice%26rft.stitle%253DFam%2BPract%26rft.aulast%253DBower%26rft.auinit1%253DP.%26rft.volume%253D18%26rft.issue%253D4%26rft.spage%253D373%26rft.epage%253D382%26rft.atitle%253DThe%2Btreatment%2Bof%2Bchild%2Band%2Badolescent%2Bmental%2Bhealth%2Bproblems%2Bin%2Bprimary%2Bcare%253A%2Ba%2Bsystematic%2Breview%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1093%252Ffampra%252F18.4.373%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11477044%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/fampra/18.4.373&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11477044&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F5%2F2%2F43.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000170705700006&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".