MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105951398 · doi:10.1071/rdv24n1ab199

199 PREMATURATION OF BOVINE OOCYTES WITH BUTYROLACTONE I AND/OR CILOSTAMIDE: EFFECTS ON MEIOSIS PROGRESSION, CYTOPLASMIC MATURATION AND GENE EXPRESSION

2011· article· en· W2105951398 on OpenAlexaff
Gisele Zoccal Mingoti, France Filion, Patrick W. Vincent, Lawrence C. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vitro maturationOocyteForskolinAndrologyActivator (genetics)ChemistryBiologyCell biologyMolecular biologyIn vitroGeneGeneticsEmbryoMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meiotic block during a prematuration culture (pre-IVM) before in vitro maturation (IVM) is suggested as a way to provide additional time to synchronize oocyte-somatic cell communication, leading to improved cytoplasmic maturation and nuclear meiotic competence and the acquisition of critical cellular functions necessary for developmental competence. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of the inhibitors butyrolactone I (Bl-I) and cilostamide on oocyte nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation. For that, 2 well-established methods of pre-IVM and IVM for cilostamide (Albuz et al. 2010 Hum. Reprod.25, 2999–3011) or Bl-I (Hashimoto et al. 2002 Biol Reprod.66, 1696–1701) were used. Abattoir-collected oocytes were IVM in maturation medium (MM: mSOF with 0.8% BSA and hormones) for 24 h, without a previous pre-IVM culture (control). Cilostamide-group oocytes were treated for the first 2 h in vitro (pre-IVM) with 100 µM of the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin and 500 µM IBMX (nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor) and then oocytes underwent extended IVM for 30 h in the presence of 20 µM cilostamide (type 3 phosphodiesterase inhibitor; pre-IVM 2 h + IVM 30 h). The Bl-I-group oocytes were pre-IVM for 24 h with 100 µM Bl-I diluted in TCM-199 supplemented with 0.2 mM pyruvate and then were IVM in MM for 20 h (pre-IVM 24 h + IVM 20 h). The Bl-I + Cilost group was a combination of both procedures: oocytes were first pre-IVM with Bl-I for 24 h and then cultured as described for the cilostamide group (pre-IVM 24 h + IVM 30 h). Cultures were carried out at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in humidified air. After IVM, oocytes were stained with 500 nM mitotracker red to assess the mitochondrial membrane potential (??m) and with 10 µg mL–1 of Hoescht 33342 to evaluate the nuclear maturation (n = 207). Images were captured by an Olympus confocal microscope and analyzed with Fluoview software. The TUNEL assay was used to detect oocyte DNA fragmentation (n = 74). Relative amounts of mRNA for apoptotic-related genes were quantified after IVM in individual oocytes using real-time PCR (Kameyama et al. 2007 Reproduction133, 423–32). Means were compared by ANOVA and Tukey's test or by chi-square (P = 0.05). The percentage of oocytes reaching metaphase II after IVM did not differ among groups (73.8 to 90.4%; P = 0.05), indicating that in vitro meiotic resumption was normal. The ??m, expressed in arbitrary units of fluorescence, was 1.0 ± 0.1a (control), 2.7 ± 0.4b (Bl-I), 3.2 ± 0.5b (Cilost) and 2.1 ± 0.3ab (Bl-I + Cilost). The percentage of TUNEL-positive oocytes (18.8–41.3%) did not differ among groups (P = 0.05). The relative abundance of BAX (1.0 ± 0.4 to 2.3 ± 0.4) and BCL-XL (1.0 ± 0.3 to 0.3 ± 0.1) transcripts was unaffected by pre-IVM and IVM (P = 0.05). In conclusion, except for an increase in mitochondrial activity, pre-IVM with cilostamide and/or Bl-I did not affect cytoplasmic and nuclear oocyte maturation. However, oocyte developmental potential needs to be better evaluated in a future study through assessment of embryonic development. We acknowledge FAPESP and NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207