Design, synthesis and in vitro cytotoxicity studies of novel pyrrolo [2,1][1,4] benzodiazepine-glycosylated pyrrole and imidazole polyamide conjugates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel pyrrolo [2,1][1,4] benzodiazepine-water insoluble 31-38 and water soluble 39-46 glycosylated pyrrole and imidazole polyamide conjugates are described that involved mercuric chloride mediated cyclization of the corresponding amino diethyl thioacetals. The compounds were prepared with varying numbers of pyrrole and imidazole containing polyamides and incorporating glucose moieties in order to improve the water solubility of PBD-polyamide conjugates and probe the structural requirements for optimal in vitro antitumor activity. These compounds were tested against a panel of 60 human cancer cells by the National Cancer Institute, and demonstrated that the water soluble PBD-polyamide compounds exhibited a higher level of cytotoxic activity than the existing natural and synthetic pyrrolo [2,1-c][1,4] benzodiazepines. The cytotoxic activities of these compounds dramatically increase after hydrolysis of their acetylated counterparts. The activity data summarized in Table 1 and Table 2 show that the solubility of the PBD-polyamides and also the type of heterocycle play important roles influencing the cytotoxic activity of the PBD-polyamide conjugates. The PBD-glycosylated polyamide (water soluble) conjugates 39-46 are highly cytotoxic against many human cancer cell lines in comparison with the PBD-polyamide (water insoluble version) conjugates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".