MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105974032 · doi:10.5455/bcp.20140918102748

Glycine Reuptake Inhibitors in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

2014· article· en· W2105974032 on OpenAlexafffund
Reji Thomas, Glen B. Baker, Serdar Dursun, Kathryn G. Todd, Kamaldeep Dhami, James Chue, Pierre Chue

Bibliographic record

VenueKlinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)ReuptakeGlycinePsychiatryReuptake inhibitorMedicinePharmacologyInternal medicineChemistryAntidepressantBiochemistrySerotoninAnxietyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Negative symptoms are present in over one quarter of patients with schizophrenia and are detrimental to prognosis, functionality and quality of life. Currently, the treatments for primary negative symptoms are inadequate. However, enhancing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunctioning with glycine reuptake inhibitors has garnered optimism as a potential treatment. Trials of sarcosine-derivatives have yielded mixed results and potential severe side effects have halted progress to larger studies. Non- sarcosine derivatives such as bitopertin have proven to be less toxic and have shown success in phase II trials. Unfortunately, phase III trials of bitopertin to date have not met primary endpoints and a void in effective treatment options for negative symptoms persists. Further research to improve psychiatric study design, discover clinical biomarkers and build on early successes of other potential pharmacologic molecules is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKlinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical PsychopharmacologySame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207