Characterization of cell‐ and region‐specific abnormalities in the epididymis of cathepsin a deficient mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cathepsin A (PPCA), a lysosomal carboxypeptidase that functions as a protective protein for alpha-neuraminidase and beta-galactosidase in a multi-enzyme complex, has been shown to be expressed in the epithelial cells of the epididymis. In the present study, the epididymis of PPCA-/- mice from 2 to 10 months of age was compared with those of their wild-type counterparts. Major accumulations of pale vacuoles, corresponding to lysosomes, were noted in principal and narrow/apical cells in PPCA-/- mice, and clear cells also appearing highly vacuolated, were grossly enlarged in size. This was especially evident in the caput and corpus regions, where quantitative analyses confirmed that the epithelium of the tubules in these regions was expanding in profile area. In addition, the base of the epithelium in these regions was often greatly vacuolated, corresponding to cells that presented no identifiable features and appeared to be degenerating. Halo cells dispersed at various levels in the epithelium also appeared to be abnormal, accumulating pale lysosomes. Furthermore, numerous macrophages were observed in the intertubular space of the entire duct, presenting a large size and plethora of pale lysosomes. Taken together, the present data indicate major lysosomal abnormalities in the epididymis of PPCA-/- mice in a cell type and region specific manner. In addition, it is suggested that the compromised halo cells, due to PPCA deficiency within their lysosomes, cannot function properly and as a result there is a recruitment of macrophages in the intertubular space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".