Styles de relations et conduites sexuelles d’hommes francophones montréalais qui ont des rapports sexuels avec d’autres hommes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre d'une étude réalisée à Montréal, 425 hommes francophones nés au Québec ayant des relations sexuelles avec d'autres hommes ont répondu à un questionnaire à remplir soi-même. Ce questionnaire portait sur leur conception de la sexualité, leurs conduites sexuelles, leurs attitudes à l'égard du condom, leurs rapports de pouvoir et de négociation en situation érotique et leur participation à certaines activités de la communauté gaie. Il ressort que monogamie, non-monogamie ou rapports occasionnels interviennent sur les dimensions précédentes, dessinant des styles de vie relativement différenciés. Ces derniers constituent donc un aspect important pour comprendre la dynamique de la vie amoureuse et sexuelle des hommes ayant des relations sexuelles avec d'autres hommes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".