MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105992657 · doi:10.12968/gasn.2008.6.3.29127

Peri−anal disease: developing a nurse−led follow-up clinic

2008· article· en· W2105992657 on OpenAlexaff
Fiona Hibberts

Bibliographic record

VenueGastrointestinal Nursing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAuditNursingService (business)Patient satisfactionDiseasePeriInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article outlines the development of a nurse−led clinic for patients following surgery and conservative treatment for benign peri−anal disease. Outlining the patient′s pathway and identifying problems through a patient mapping excercise was conducted. A nurse−led clinic was then set up, outlining training and supervision needs, practical and management issues, and audit details. An audit and patient satisfaction survey was then completed and the outcome was very positive for the new service. Patient information was also developed to enhance the service. The article concludes that nurse−led services are beneficial to patients and can help reduce complications and further admissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastrointestinal NursingSame topicAnorectal Disease Treatments and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207