Formation of organosilicon compounds 117:<sup>1</sup> C-brominated 1,3,5-trisilacyclohexanes and their reactions with BuLi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photobromination of 1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyl-1,3,5-trisilacyclohexane (1) almost exclusively attacks CH2 groups and results in 2,2-dibromo-trisilacyclohexane (2) as well as 2,2,4,4-tetrabromo-trisilacyclohexane (3) in high yields. Starting from a mixture of C-brominated trisilacyclohexanes the isomeric 2,2,9-tribromo-1,3,3,5,5,8,8,10,10,13,13-undecamethyl-1,3,5,8,10,13-hexasilabicyclo[7.2.2]tridec-6-yne (6) had been obtained in very low yield in an attempt to establish a preparative route to adamantanes with a C4Si6 skeleton, i.e., with C bridgeheads and SiR2 bridges. By ICl-cleavage of a Simethyl bond in 2 and subsequent substitution with Br3CLi, the trisilacyclohexane 4 with functional groups in opposite positions of the ring can be obtained. Linking the step-by-step synthesized Cl-Me2Si-C=C-SiMe2-CH2-SiMe2-Ph to the CBr3 group of 4 results after HBr-cleavage of the SiPh bond in (ω-bromo-octynyl)-trisilacyclohexane (12). A ring closure of 12 would result in an isomeric hexasila bicyclo[7.2.2]tridec-6-yne. The compounds were characterized by 1H, 13C, and 29Si NMR spectra. Additionally, the molecular structures of 4 and 6 were confirmed by X-ray single crystal investigations.Key words: 1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyl-1,3,5-trisilacyclohexane, bromination, 2,2,9-tribromo-1,3,3,5,5,8,8,10,10,13,13-undecamethyl-1,3,5,8,10,13-hexasilabicyclo[7.2.2]tridec-6-yne, carbosilane synthesis, NMR data, crystal structure investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".