MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106021325 · doi:10.1109/freq.2007.4319046

Jitter reduction of the 729 nm clock laser for a Ca+ optical frequency standard

2007· article· en· W2106021325 on OpenAlexaff
C. Zumsteg, G. Hagel, C. Champenois, D. Guyomarc’h, M. Houssin, Martina Knoop, M. Vedel, F. Vedel, P. Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser linewidthLaserMetastabilityZeeman effectPhysicsAtomic clockAtomic physicsGround stateOpticsMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electric quadrupole transition between the ground state and the first metastable state of a single Ca ion is an attractive choice for a frequency standard in the optical domain. Probing of the clock transition is carried out using quantum jump statistics which requires cycle times of several seconds. The spectral linewidth of the probe laser (local oscillator) must reach the hertz level for a duration at least as long as these cycle times. To reduce the TiSa laser linewidth at 729 nm, we use a KD*P electro-optic modulator (EOM) inside the laser cavity. This device shows a couple of mechanical resonances induced by piezo-electric ringing at frequencies larger than 50 kHz, limiting notably the use of the device for frequency corrections. Actual performances (Deltav+ion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the IEEE International Frequency Control SymposiumSame topicAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsFrench-language works237,207