MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106028416 · doi:10.1088/0268-1242/22/1/s50

Study of the relaxation of strain in patterned Si/SiGe structures using an x-ray diffraction technique

2006· article· en· W2106028416 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSemiconductor Science and Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronRyerson University
KeywordsDiffractionMaterials scienceAnisotropyCondensed matter physicsLattice (music)Substrate (aquarium)Relaxation (psychology)Lattice constantStrain (injury)X-ray crystallographyCrystallographyOpticsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an investigation of a series of samples with strained stripe-patterned SiGe layers grown on a Si substrate. The strain in the SiGe striped epilayers was calculated after measuring the lattice constants of the layers using an x-ray diffraction technique. It was found that the stripes showed an anisotropic strain in the two in-plane directions resulting from the lattice mismatch and the difference in the dimensions of the stripes. The idea is based on the concept of enhancing the hole mobility in subsequent Si cap layers due to anisotropy of the stain in the patterned SiGe layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it