Monitoring Snow-Cover Depletion by Coupling Satellite Imagery with a Distributed Snowmelt Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many watersheds in Canada and in the northern United States see most of their precipitation in the form of snow. Many of these watersheds are the sites of important hydropower development projects. During snowmelt, watershed managers require information on snowpack depletion in order to optimize power production while minimizing flooding risk. In many cases, management techniques are based on simple correlations extracted from data collected in previous years or on inappropriate tools for data interpretation. Both of these factors can affect the reliability of forecasts and result in production losses or increased risk in downstream areas. This paper presents an approach to improve snowmelt forecasts. A simple distributed snowmelt model based on the degree-days approach is used to predict snowmelt based on weather forecasts. To improve forecasts, a feedback algorithm is presented that allows for real-time model adjustment using the integration of NOAA-AVHRR remote sensing data. A case study is presented based on a central Quebec watershed for the 1999 snowmelt season. This watershed is mostly under the management of Alcan Inc., which uses hydropower for the production of aluminum in its Jonquière, Que., Canada plant. A real-time simulation was carried out that resulted in a significant improvement of the timing of the flood peak forecast. With only one satellite image, the forecasting error of the flood peak was decreased by 5days (from 7 to 2) and reduced to less than 1day with the use of a second image, acquired 2days later. For this watershed, each one-day improvement in the timing of the peak flood forecast is worth tens of thousands of dollars in hydropower.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".