MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106038942 · doi:10.26522/brocked.v15i2.73

Competency-based Education and Practical Training: Document Analysis and Critique

2006· article· fr· W2106038942 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock Education Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicCompetency Development and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAction (physics)SociologyPerspective (graphical)PhilosophyArtPhysicsVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la première génération d’APC, le concept de compétence est lié aux concepts de comportement, pratique, performance et action (Gage & Winne, 1975; Hamilton, 1973; Hilbert, 1982; Howsam & Houston, 1972; Joyce, 1974; Leonard & Utz, 1974; Schostak, 1996; Spady, 1977; Tomlinson, 1995; Woodruffe, 1992). Sur le plan conceptuel, cette définition s’oppose à la perspective dichotomique inspirée de Chomsky (1957). Pour ce dernier, d’une part, la compétence est un potentiel d’action et non l’action comme telle; d’autre part, l’action qui actualise le potentiel-compétence est une performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it