MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106040177 · doi:10.1109/pes.2004.1373187

Development of a DC current-blocking device for transformer neutrals

2004· article· en· W2106040177 on OpenAlexaffabout
L. Bolduc, Matthew Granger, P. Gregoire, J. Saintonge, L. Brophy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical engineeringBlocking (statistics)TransformerCapacitorGroundCurrent transformerElectric power systemVoltageEngineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Computer networkPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. In the early 1990s, Hydro-Quebec undertook a joint project with GE to develop and commission a DC current-blocking series capacitor for the transmission lines forming part of its main power system in the area surrounding the grounding electrode of the Radisson HVDC substation. The aim of this project was to minimize the harmful effects of DC current flowing through the main network during the ground-return operating mode of the Radisson-Sandy Pond multiterminal HVDC link. With a view to having available technology applicable anywhere in the network, TransEnergie and IREQ, two divisions of Hydro-Quebec, later took part in the development of a DC current blocking device that could be installed in transformer neutrals. This work was undertaken not only with immediate needs in mind but also to solve specific problems that could appear sporadically at different network locations. Tests on a prototype of the new blocking device were performed in the high power laboratory at IREQ, followed by tests on the preproduction unit, in accordance with the specified requirements. The neutral DC current blocking device (NCBD) was then installed at a regional substation for a one-year operating period to verify its immunity under normal network events and switching conditions. During this period, no disruption to the smooth operation of the substation or protection of the AC system occurred. The NCBD operated correctly and suffered no fault or unsolicited operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207