Optimization-based manufacturing scheduling with multiple resources, setup requirements, and transfer lots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing demand for on-time delivery of products and low production cost is forcing manufacturers to seek effective schedules to coordinate machines and operators so as to reduce costs associated with labor, setup, inventory, and unhappy customers. This paper presents the modeling and resolution of a job shop scheduling system for J. M. Products Inc., whose manufacturing is characterized by the need to simultaneously consider machines and operators, machines requiring significant setup times, operators of different capabilities, and lots dividable into transfer lots. These characteristics are typical for many manufacturers, difficult to handle, and have not been adequately addressed in the literature. In our study, an integer optimization formulation with a separable structure is developed where both machines and operators are modeled as resources with finite capacities. Setups are explicitly considered following our previous work with additional penalties on excessive setups. By analyzing transfer lot dynamics, transfer lots are modeled by using linear inequalities. The objective is to maximize on-time delivery of products, reduce inventory, and reduce the number of setups. By relaxing resource capacity constraints and portions of precedence constraints, the problem is decomposed into smaller subproblems that are effectively solved by using a novel dynamic programming procedure. The multipliers are updated using the recently developed surrogate subgradient method. A heuristic is then used to obtain a feasible schedule based on subproblem solutions. Numerical testing shows that the method generates high quality schedules in a timely fashion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".