MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106102418 · doi:10.1517/17425240903386658

The pharmacokinetics of a long-acting OROS hydromorphone formulation

2009· review· en· W2106102418 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Turgeon, R Gröning, Gayatri Sathyan, John Thipphawong, Ute Richarz

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Delivery · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersCilag
KeywordsHydromorphonePharmacokineticsPharmacologyMedicineAnesthesiaOpioidInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: New formulations of opiods can provide round-the-clock pain relief to improve pain management and quality of life for patients with chronic pain. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: Information and comments on the pharmacokinetic processes associated with a new once-daily formulation of the potent opiod hydromorphone. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: This review presents an overview of data from several small pharmacokinetic studies to gain a better perspective on the pharmacokinetic properties of a new long-acting formulation of hydromorphone. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The development of advanced oral formulation that deliver analgesic drugs over an extended period provides new solutions to improve pain management and quality of life for patients with chronic pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Drug DeliverySame topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207