MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106135874 · doi:10.1109/icc.1993.397424

Computational methods for performance evaluation of an ATM multiplexer supporting bursty traffic

2002· article· en· W2106135874 on OpenAlexaff
Guangbin Wu, J.W. Mark

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplexerComputer scienceQueueing theoryAsynchronous communicationAsynchronous Transfer ModeQueueSuperposition principleSet (abstract data type)Boundary (topology)AlgorithmProcess (computing)Function (biology)Real-time computingMultiplexingComputer networkTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) multiplexer supporting a number of bursty sources is modeled as a discrete time, single server queuing system with an infinite buffer. The probability generating function (PGF) method is used to analyze the queuing behavior. The PGF method requires the determination of a large number of boundary values, and hence the roots of the characteristic equation. An iterative algorithm for evaluating the roots is proposed. The algorithm is decomposable when the arrival process is a superposition of elemental processes. Conditions for all the roots to be real are established. A set of equations to recursively compute the moments of the queue length is derived. The proposed methods are used to evaluate the performance of an ATM multiplexer supporting either voice or video traffic.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207