MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P1-S4.14 Does core theory apply in rural environments?

2011· article· en· W2106157303 on OpenAlexaff
Dionne Gesink, Anna Sullivan, Todd A. Norwood, Marc L. Serre, William C. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsCancer Care OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuralityCensusDemographySyphilisRural areaGeographyMedicinePopulationOutbreakPublic healthSocioeconomicsEnvironmental healthHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Virology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The expansion of core theory to include geographically defined core areas of elevated infection has been based primarily on spatial investigations into sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in large urban areas. It is uncertain whether core theory is applicable for rural environments. Our objective was to evaluate the concept of geographical core areas for gonorrhoea and syphilis in North Carolina, a rural state with urban pockets. Methods We analysed geomasked gonorrhoea and syphilis cases reported to the North Carolina State Health Department's sexually transmitted disease surveillance program from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007 for gonorrhoea and from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2007 for syphilis. Incident gonorrhoea and syphilis rates were estimated using census tract level population estimates for the total North Carolina population from the US census. Rates were mapped by census tract and quarter. Rurality was measured at the census tract using two different definitions: percent rural and rural-urban commuting area (RUCA). RUCAs were used to classify North Carolina census tracts into rural, small town, micropolitan, or urban. SatScan was used to identify spatiotemporal clusters of significantly elevated rates of infection. Clusters were classified as outbreak or core based on duration. Clusters lasting the entire study period were considered potential core areas, while clusters of shorter duration were considered outbreak areas. Clusters were overlaid on maps of rurality and qualitatively assessed for correlation. Results On average, gonorrhoea rates are low in the western mountains and higher in the eastern coastal part of the state. Most of the clusters were located in urban RUCAs or very low percent rural. Clusters for rural and small town RUCAs were of short duration and usually covered several census tracts and sometimes more than one county. Consequently, they were considered outbreak areas rather than core areas. Similar results were found for syphilis. Conclusions We found that core areas of elevated STIs were limited to the urban centers in rural environments. Significant clusters of infection in rural environments appear to be due to outbreaks. Rural environments may have core areas but not enough infection to sustain ongoing transmission. Bridge contacts may be more important for STI transmission in rural environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207