MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106185272 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2006.354253

Real Time Implementation of a Wiener Filter Based Crystal Identification Algorithm for Photon Counting CT Imaging

2006· article· en· W2106185272 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Viscogliosi, Joël Riendeau, P. Bérard, Roch Lefebvre, Roger Lecomte, Réjean Fontaine

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLyso-Avalanche photodiodeFilter (signal processing)AlgorithmPhysicsScintillatorPhoton countingSilicon photomultiplierOpticsProjection (relational algebra)PhotonWiener filterComputer scienceDetectorComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recently launched LabPETtrade, a small animal avalanche photodiode (APD)-based PET scanner with quasi-individual readout and massively parallel processing, makes it possible to acquire both computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) images using the same detection system. However, since each APD is coupled to an LYSO/LGSO phoswich scintillator pair, an efficient crystal identification algorithm must be developed to meet the stringent requirements of CT data acquisition in single photon counting mode. We propose a new ultra-fast crystal identification algorithm based on a Wiener filter. This filter instantly recovers crystal parameters by minimizing a linear cost function. A simple one-dimension projection based discrimination is used to identify the scintillating crystal. The algorithm achieves a discrimination rate of 88% for low-energy X-ray photons (~60 keV) at a high count rate >1 M events/sec/channel when implemented in a field programmable gate array.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference RecordSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207