Sand–Water Flows on Cold-Climate Eolian Dunes: Environmental Analogs for the Eolian Rock Record and Martian Sand Dunes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sand–water flows were observed on the slopes of cold-climate eolian dunes in southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada, during episodes of intense thawing in the winters of 2004 and 2005. Meltwater produced flows with varying grain–water contents on slopes of active blowout hollows and parabolic dunes. The sand–water flows emplaced small, structureless, lobate- and tongue-shaped deposits and alluvial fans. The greatest concentration of deposits occurred on south-facing slopes, which frequently thaw in winter from intense insolation. Transport modes ranged from high-density, viscous slurry flows to lowdensity, hyperconcentrated flows. The triggering cause of these flows is high pore-water pressure that develops in thawed nearsurface sand due to impeded infiltration by frozen sand with pore ice at depth. These observations broaden the environmental context of sand–water flows on dunes and contribute to interpretations of these deposits in the eolian rock record and to recent alluvial features observed on Martian sand dunes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".