MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106227424 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511730054.015

Quasi-finite Algebras Graded by Hamiltonian and Vertex Operator Algebras

2010· book-chapter· en· W2106227424 on OpenAlexaff
Atsushi Matsuo, Kiyokazu Nagatomo, Akihiro Tsuchiya

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVertex operator algebraMathematicsVertex (graph theory)BimoduleOperator algebraSubalgebraPure mathematicsNest algebraInterior algebraNon-associative algebraAssociative propertyAlgebra representationAlgebra over a fieldUniversal enveloping algebraJordan algebraDiscrete mathematicsGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A general notion of a quasi-finite algebra is introduced as an algebra graded by the set of all integers equipped with topologies on the homogeneous subspaces satisfying certain properties. An analogue of the regular bimodule is introduced and various module categories over quasi-finite algebras are described. When applied to the current algebras (universal enveloping algebras) of vertex operator algebras satisfying Zhu's C 2 -finiteness condition, our general consideration derives important consequences on representation theory of such vertex operator algebras. In particular, the category of modules over such a vertex operator algebra is shown to be equivalent to the category of modules over a finite-dimensional associative algebra. Introduction In order to construct conformal field theories on Riemann surfaces associated with a vertex operator algebra V and to obtain their properties such as the finite-dimensionality of the space of conformal blocks, factorization of the blocks along the boundaries of the moduli space of Riemann surfaces and the fusion functors or the tensor product of V -modules, we need first to impose an appropriate finiteness condition on V and second to study the structure of the abelian category of V -modules to some extent. One of the candidates of such a finiteness condition is the one introduced by Y.-C. Zhu ([Zhu]), usually called the C 2 -finiteness (or C 2 -cofiniteness), saying that a certain quotient space V /C 2 ( V ) is finite-dimensional. We will call this condition Zhu's finiteness condition in the rest of the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207