O salto de volta à multidimensionalidade: perspectivas de compreensão do corpo na cibersociedade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current work investigates how the body is perceived in cybersociety, and the theories and approaches that have been related to it. The introduction presents a retrospective of the process through which the body has been transformed into an image. This process has its roots in early Christian theology, which legitimizes the cult of the image of Christ body, and anatomy studies started in the Modern age. The two approaches of the perception of the human body mentioned contributed to the creation of a single interpretation based of the dead body. This is the hypothesis of Dietmar Kamper and they announce the ascension of the bodymachine. The idea of the body as a machine has been adapted to the post-modern reality, more specifically to what Jean Baudrillard calls hyper-reality -the moment when simulations and models substitute the very perception of the world itself. Hyper-reality theory and models were then used to base and reflect the constitution of simulacra of the body. Hence hyperrealism was the term coined by the Canadian thinker Arthur Kroker, and it indicates a state in which reality itself becomes less and less tangible while the perception of the body gradually disappears. Based on these propositions the thesis investigates some of the theories that affirm that the human body today is a hybrid, formed through the junction between the organic and the inorganic, also known as cyborg-body, or biocybernetic-body, which announces a postevolutionary stage of man. Through the thinker Lucien Sfez, it was perceived how these theories are in balance with an utopia that tries to create a Super-Humanity and with the ascetics ideals so criticized by Friedrich Nietzsche. Therefore it was investigated in the german philosophers work his observations related to the body, as well as the ones of the french thinker Antonin Artaud, in order to locate in both authors how would happen the strategy of the scape of the language through the body. This leads to the Lacanian concept of the Real and that Dietmar Kamper takes to understand the body as not assimilable to the language. Kamper also looks for the linking between the body and the multiple dimensions, getting to the conclusion that it to be in the digital communication needs to leave its senses gradually in order to reach the zero point of the whole abstraction. The only way to recover the senses would be through dimensional leaps. Finally, it is taken the sentient body concept, in chiasm, developed by Merleau -Ponty. This body emerges from the contact with the world and precedes the language, leading to Michel Serres that, although a strong critic to phenomenology, recovers the main role of the senses and the movement of the body in the constitution of a knowledge that is in constant change and which can be associated to the Nietzsches thought.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".