Differential phosphorylation of the phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase MTMR2 regulates its association with early endosomal subtypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myotubularin-related 2 (MTMR2) is a 3-phosphoinositide lipid phosphatase with specificity towards the D-3 position of phosphoinositol 3-phosphate [PI(3)P] and phosphoinositol 3,5-bisphosphate lipids enriched on endosomal structures. Recently, we have shown that phosphorylation of MTMR2 on Ser58 is responsible for its cytoplasmic sequestration and that a phosphorylation-deficient variant (S58A) targets MTMR2 to Rab5-positive endosomes resulting in PI(3)P depletion and an increase in endosomal signaling, including a significant increase in ERK1/2 activation. Using in vitro kinase assays, cellular MAPK inhibitors, siRNA knockdown and a phosphospecific-Ser58 antibody, we now provide evidence that ERK1/2 is the kinase responsible for phosphorylating MTMR2 at position Ser58, which suggests that the endosomal targeting of MTMR2 is regulated through an ERK1/2 negative feedback mechanism. Surprisingly, treatment with multiple MAPK inhibitors resulted in a MTMR2 localization shift from Rab5-positive endosomes to the more proximal APPL1-positive endosomes. This MTMR2 localization shift was recapitulated when a double phosphorylation-deficient mutant (MTMR2 S58A/S631A) was characterized. Moreover, expression of this double phosphorylation-deficient MTMR2 variant led to a more sustained and pronounced increase in ERK1/2 activation compared with MTMR2 S58A. Further analysis of combinatorial phospho-mimetic mutants demonstrated that it is the phosphorylation status of Ser58 that regulates general endosomal binding and that the phosphorylation status of Ser631 mediates the endosomal shuttling between Rab5 and APPL1 subtypes. Taken together, these results reveal that MTMR2 compartmentalization and potential subsequent effects on endosome maturation and endosome signaling are dynamically regulated through MAPK-mediated differential phosphorylation events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".