Static and dynamic operating characteristics of a pericardial balloon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously, we developed a balloon transducer to measure the constraint of the pericardium (i.e., pericardial pressure) on the surface of the heart. It was validated physiologically in that it was shown to measure a pressure equal to the difference between the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure measured before and after pericardiectomy at the same left ventricular volume. To define its static operating characteristics, we loaded the balloon nonuniformly with weights that covered fractions of the balloon surface and found that the balloon accurately recorded the average stress if the stress was applied over at least 23% of its surface. To test its performance when curved, we placed it in large and small cylinders (minimum diameter 31 mm) and found that the balloon accurately recorded the stress. To define its dynamic operating characteristics, we applied sinusoidal stresses and found that its frequency response was limited only by that of the connecting catheter. When better dynamic response is required, we introduce a micromanometer-tipped catheter to obtain a unity-gain frequency response that is flat to 200 Hz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".