MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106339652 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.224417

Quantum phase transition in Heisenberg-Kitaev model

2012· article· en· W2106339652 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Schaffer, Subhro Bhattacharjee, Yong Baek Kim

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinonPhysicsGapless playbackQuantum spin liquidSpin (aerodynamics)AntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsPhase transitionQuantum phase transitionHeisenberg modelMean field theoryQuantum mechanicsSpin polarizationElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We explore the nature of the quantum phase transition between a magnetically ordered state with collinear spin pattern and a gapless ${Z}_{2}$ spin liquid in the Heisenberg-Kitaev model. We construct a slave particle mean-field theory for the Heisenberg-Kitaev model in terms of complex fermionic spinons. It is shown that this theory, formulated in the appropriate basis, is capable of describing the Kitaev spin liquid as well as the transition between the gapless ${Z}_{2}$ spin liquid and the so-called stripy antiferromagnet. Within our mean-field theory, we find a discontinuous transition from the ${Z}_{2}$ spin liquid to the stripy antiferromagnet. We argue that subtle spinon confinement effects, associated with the instability of gapped $U(1)$ spin liquid in two spatial dimensions, play an important role at this transition. The possibility of an exotic continuous transition is briefly addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207