The importance of grade 2 ischemic mitral regurgitation in coronary artery bypass grafting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study if grade 2 ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) influences outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Results of all CABG patients with grade 2/4 ischemic MR operated during 1995--1998 (n = 89) were compared with all CABG patients without MR (n = 4709) during the same period. To further evaluate patients with grade 2 ischemic MR, a case-control study focusing on functional status was performed. Control patients without MR (n = 89) were matched for age, gender and left ventricular ejection fraction. All patients were interviewed regarding angina symptoms and functional status. RESULTS: Survival according to Kaplan--Meier at 1 and 3 years were inferior in the MR group compared to all CABG patients (91 vs 96% and 84 vs 92%, respectively (P = 0.0017). However, MR patients were older (68 +/- 9 vs 65 +/- 9 years (mean +/- SD), P = 0.008) and had an inferior preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (42 +/- 14 vs 58 +/- 14%, P < 0.0001). In the case-control study, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and Higgins' risk score differed preoperatively between the MR group and controls. Neither 30-day mortality (4,5% in both groups) nor survival at 1 (91 vs 93%) and 3 years (84 vs 88%) differed significantly. NYHA class and angina class (Canadian Cardiovascular Society, CCS) improved similarly in both groups. Postoperatively, 62% of the patients in the MR group had reduced, 36% unchanged and 2% increased MR. CONCLUSIONS: CABG on patients with grade 2 ischemic MR reduces angina pectoris and improves functional status to the same extent as in CABG patients without MR. Postoperative morbidity and mortality do not differ significantly between the groups. Grade of MR is reduced or unchanged after CABG in patients with grade 2 ischemic MR. The study supports an operative strategy where grade 2 ischemic mitral regurgitation is treated by CABG alone but the result do not exclude that there might be individual patients that would benefit from a valvular or annular procedure in combination with CABG. How these patients should be identified remains unclear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".