Tribute to R. G. Boutilier: The role for skeletal muscle in the hypoxia-induced hypometabolic responses of submerged frogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Much of Bob Boutilier's research characterised the subcellular, organ-level and in vivo behavioural responses of frogs to environmental hypoxia. His entirely integrative approach helped to reveal the diversity of tissue-level responses to O(2) lack and to advance our understanding of the ecological relevance of hypoxia tolerance in frogs. Work from Bob's lab mainly focused on the role for skeletal muscle in the hypoxic energetics of overwintering frogs. Muscle energy demand affects whole-body metabolism, not only because of its capacity for rapid increases in ATP usage, but also because hypometabolism of the large skeletal muscle mass in inactive animals impacts so greatly on in vivo energetics. The oxyconformance and typical hypoxia-tolerance characteristics (e.g. suppressed heat flux and preserved membrane ion gradients during O(2) lack) of skeletal muscle in vitro suggest that muscle hypoperfusion in vivo is possibly a key mechanism for (i) downregulating muscle and whole-body metabolic rates and (ii) redistributing O(2) supply to hypoxia-sensitive tissues. The gradual onset of a low-level aerobic metabolic state in the muscle of hypoxic, cold-submerged frogs is indeed important for slowing depletion of on-board fuels and extending overwintering survival time. However, it has long been known that overwintering frogs cannot survive anoxia or even severe hypoxia. Recent work shows that they remain sensitive to ambient O(2) and that they emerge rapidly from quiescence in order to actively avoid environmental hypoxia. Hence, overwintering frogs experience periods of hypometabolic quiescence interspersed with episodes of costly hypoxia avoidance behaviour and exercise recovery. In keeping with this flexible physiology and behaviour, muscle mechanical properties in frogs do not deteriorate during periods of overwintering quiescence. On-going studies inspired by Bob Boutilier's integrative mindset continue to illuminate the cost-benefit(s) of intermittent locomotion in overwintering frogs, the constraints on muscle function during hypoxia, the mechanisms of tissue-level hypometabolism, and the details of possible muscle atrophy resistance in quiescent frogs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".