MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106364092 · doi:10.1080/07060660609507292

Variation in electrophoretic karyotype among Mexican isolates of<i>Mycosphaerella fijiensis</i>

2006· article· en· W2106364092 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cecilia Mónica Rodríguez-García, N. Raigosa-Flores, Laura Conde‐Ferráez, Leticia Peraza-Echeverrı́a, Blondy Canto‐Canché, Andrew James-Kay

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le DéveloppementConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsBiologyKaryotypeGenome sizeChromosomeMycosphaerellaGeneticsGenomeGeneBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrophoretic karyotype of the filamentous fungus Mycosphaerella fijiensis was determined using contour-clamped homogenous electric field (CHEF) gel electrophoresis. Among 10 isolates from different geographical areas, the highest variation in the banding profiles was found in the chromosomes with sizes below 1.5 megabases pairs (Mbp). The minimal genome size was estimated to range from 27 to 35 Mbp. Eight to 13 chromosomal bands, ranging approximately from 0.5 to 8.6 Mbp in size, were separated. These results open perspectives for the physical mapping of specific genes, such as those associated with avirulence, pathogenicity, and fungicide resistance, and for the construction of chromosome-specific libraries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207