MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106372359 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2005.1415433

Indexing of NFL Video using MPEG-7 Descriptors and MFCC features

2006· article· en· W2106372359 on OpenAlexaff
S.G. Quadri, Sridhar Krishnan, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSearch engine indexingComputer scienceMel-frequency cepstrumArtificial intelligenceEvent (particle physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Feature extractionPoint (geometry)Database indexSupport vector machineMotion (physics)Computer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an application system to classify American football (NFL) video shots into 4 categories, namely: pass plays, run plays, field goal/extra point plays (FG/XP) and kickoff/punt plays (K/P). The proposed system consists of two stages. The first stage is responsible for play event localization and the latter stage is responsible for feature mapping and classification. For play event localization we have proposed an algorithm that uses MPEG-7 motion activity descriptor and mean of the magnitudes of motion vectors, in a collaborative manner to detect the starting point of a play event within a video shot with 83% accuracy. The indexing and classification stage uses MPEG-7 motion and audio descriptors along with Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC) features to classify the events into 4 categories using Fisher's LDA. We obtain indexing accuracy of 92.5% by using a leave-one-out classification technique on a database of 200 video shots taken from 4 different games obtained from 4 different networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207