Identification and characterization of soluble and insoluble myrosinase isoenzymes in different organs of <i>Sinapis alba</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extraction of Sinapis alba seeds under native conditions solubilized 3 myrosinase isoforms, pool I, II and III, which could be separated by ion exchange chromatography. Sequencing of numerous peptides of the I and III isoforms showed that they belonged to the Myrosinase A (MA) family of myrosinases and that they were encoded by different genes. Western blot analysis of S. alba seed proteins, extracted with a sodium dodecyl sulphate-containing buffer, using an anti-myrosinase monoclonal antibody, showed the presence of two additional myrosinase isoforms with approximate molecular sizes of 62 and 59 kDa. These myrosinases, which only could be solubilized from seeds by inclusion of denaturing agents in the extraction buffer, were by sequence analysis identified as MB myrosinases. These isoenzymes or very similar forms were also present in seedling cotyledons. However, from this tissue, they could be extracted with non-denaturing buffers. In addition, cotyledons contained a 65-kDa MB myrosinase not found in seeds. In contrast, seedling cotyledons contained only minute amounts of pool I and no pool III MA myrosinases, emphasizing the tissue-specific expression of the corresponding gene families. Sequence analysis of myrosinase cDNAs generated cDNA by reversed transcription-polymerase chain reaction using degenerate primers with mRNA isolated from seeds, cotyledons and leaves confirmed the result that the MA isoforms were expressed only in seed tissue, while MB myrosinases were found in all tissues investigated. Furthermore, seed and leaf contained unique MB myrosinase transcripts, suggesting organ-specific expression of individual MB genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".