MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106378877 · doi:10.1109/eumc.2008.4751493

Compact and Broadband Transition of Microstrip Line to Finite-Ground Coplanar Waveguide

2008· article· en· W2106378877 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Han, Ke Wu, Wei Hong, Xiaoping Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostripCoplanar waveguideGround planeReturn lossInsertion lossBroadbandTransmission lineTaperingConductorElectronic circuitPrinted circuit boardMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsOpticsComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringMicrowaveAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a compact and broadband transition of microstrip line to finite-ground coplanar waveguide (FGCPW) is proposed. Design rules are presented on the basis of simulation and measurement results. Both electric and magnetic fields are gradually transformed from microstrip line to FGCPW by tapering the signal conductor. The microstrip ground plane on the bottom side of the substrate is directly connected to the grounds of the FGCPW on the top side with metallic vias, providing an RF short-circuit for suppressing parasitic modes. Measured return loss is lower than -10 dB for a back-to-back structure from 0.04 GHz to 24 GHz with a low insertion loss of about 1.5 dB at 20 GHz. This kind of transition can find applications in highly integrated circuits and systems using both FGCPW and microstrip line techniques, and also offer easy and accurate measurements of FGCPW circuits with the help of simple coaxial adapters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207