Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assister à une oeuvre de Robert Wilson suppose de la part du spectateur une certaine forme de renonciation à sa façon habituelle d’aborder la création artistique. À travers un style poétique privilégiant le formalisme et la mise en évidence d’une « surface simple », l’auteur construit son système avec des éléments métacommunicationnels (titre, structure, relations son/image et texte/image). Si cette approche est bien celle des premières oeuvres vidéo de Wilson, ce texte entend démontrer qu’avec La Mort de Molière, on assiste à un changement apparent de stratégie. Grâce notamment à l’utilisation d’un texte dit en voix hors champ, en ajout aux autres éléments formels, une dislocation se produit en ce qui a trait à notre réception. Une lutte s’installe entre les deux hémisphères cérébraux qui possèdent des fonctions de perception complémentaires. Pour dénouer l’impasse et obtenir la haute définition souhaitée, plus d’une lecture de l’oeuvre sera nécessaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".