MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106389835 · doi:10.5539/ijps.v5n1p139

Phonological Awareness and Working Memory in Arabic-Speaking Egyptian Preschool Children at Risk for Dyslexia

2013· article· en· W2106389835 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amal Mohamed Zayed, Alysia D. Roehrig, Nasra M. Gilgil

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychological Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhonological awarenessDyslexiaPsychologyArabicDevelopmental psychologyWorking memoryReading (process)Phonological developmentPhonologyCognitive psychologyCognitionLinguisticsLiteracy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between phonological awareness, verbal workingmemory, and risk for dyslexia in Arabic language in preschool children. The participants of this study werepreschool children between the ages of five and six, who represented two groups: (20) children at risk fordyslexia and (20) children normal without any risk for dyslexia. These children were randomly selected from alarger sample of 425 preschool children in Egypt. Phonological awareness and verbal working memory taskswere used to compare children's abilities. The findings indicate that there is a strong relationship betweenphonological awareness and working memory. In addition, phonological awareness and working memory mayhave an effect on children’s phonological sensitivity and reading skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Psychological StudiesSame topicReading and Literacy DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207