The astrocytic barrier to axonal regeneration at the dorsal root entry zone is induced by rhizotomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After dorsal rhizotomy, sensory axons fail to regenerate beyond the astrocytic glia limitans at the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) but this inhibition can be overcome with the delivery of exogenous neurotrophin-3. We investigated whether axonal inhibition at the DREZ is constitutive or induced after dorsal rhizotomy. Primary afferent neurones from enhanced green fluorescent protein-expressing mice were transplanted into adult rat dorsal root ganglia in the presence or absence of dorsal rhizotomy. In the absence of dorsal rhizotomy mouse axons freely extended into the rat central nervous system. After host dorsal rhizotomy, mouse axons were unable to cross the DREZ. However, in rats that received a dorsal rhizotomy concomitant with intrathecal neurotrophin-3, the mouse axons were able to cross the DREZ. These results indicate that, under normal circumstances, the adult DREZ is permissive to the regeneration of adult sensory axons and that it only becomes inhibitory once dorsal root axons have been injured and astrocytes at the DREZ have become reactive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".