Connection data rate optimisation of IEEE 802.15.3 scatternets with multirate carriers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Designed for high rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs), the IEEE 802.15.3 Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol supports peer-to-peer communications in a piconet. In this paper, we analyse the link rate distribution of an 802.15.3 piconet employing multirate carriers at the physical layer, and show that the Expected Piconet Link Rate (EPLR) decreases gradually with the piconet radius. Furthermore, the Effective Scatternet Connection Rate (ESCR) is defined to minimise the stream connection cost in a scatternet by optimising the piconet coverage. Analytical and simulation results show that direct peer-to-peer communications in 802.15.3 piconets bring a huge gain in the expected data rate of intra-piconet links. While the maximum piconet size minimises the number of piconets in the scatternet and the number of hops for a randomly chosen connection, a medium sized piconet radius optimises the scatternet connection data rate. Thus, configuration of scatternets needs to consider the piconet size and channel reuse given the number of logical channels available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it