MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106474248 · doi:10.1111/1467-8586.00096

Is More Information a Good Thing? Bias Nonmonotonicity in Stochastic Difference Equations

2000· article· en· W2106474248 on OpenAlex
Karim M. Abadir, Kaddour Hadri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Economic Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive modelEconometricsAsymptotic analysisRelevance (law)Sample (material)MathematicsSTAR modelApplied mathematicsFunction (biology)Statistical physicsEconomicsStatisticsPhysicsTime seriesAutoregressive integrated moving averageThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown that the bias of estimated parameters in autoregressive models can increase as the sample size grows. This bias is also a nonmonotonic function of the largest autoregressive root, contrary to what asymptotic approximations had indicated so far in the literature. These unusual results are due to the effect of the initial sample observations that are typically neglected in theoretical asymptotic analysis, in spite of their empirical relevance. Implications for practical economic modelling are considered, including a comparison of the likely inaccuracies of parameter estimates in alternative models based on competing macroeconomic theories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it