MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106509114 · doi:10.1109/tim.2007.894228

An Improved Max-Log-MAP Algorithm for Turbo Decoding and Turbo Equalization

2007· article· en· W2106509114 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbo equalizerAlgorithmTurboTurbo codeDifference-map algorithmDecoding methodsIntersymbol interferenceLogarithmComputer scienceMaximum a posteriori estimationEqualization (audio)Serial concatenated convolutional codesAdditive white Gaussian noiseMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Concatenated error correction codeEngineeringTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an improved Max-Log-maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm for turbo decoding and turbo equalization. The proposed algorithm utilizes the MacLaurin Series to expand the logarithmic term in the Jacobian logarithmic function of the Log-MAP algorithm. In terms of complexity, the proposed algorithm can easily be implemented by means of adders and comparators as this is the case for the Max-Log-MAP algorithm. In addition, simulation results show that the proposed algorithm performs very closely to the Log-MAP algorithm for both turbo decoding over additive-white-Gaussian-noise channels and turbo equalization over frequency-selective channels. Further, it is shown than even in a high-loss intersymbol-interference channel, the proposed algorithm preserves its performance close to that of the Log-Map algorithm, while there is a wide gap between the performance of the Log-MAP and Max-Log-MAP turbo equalizers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it