Semi‐Continuous Emulsion Copolymerization of Styrene‐Butyl Acrylate with Methacrylic Acid: Box‐Behnken Design of Experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A three‐factor three‐level Box‐Behnken design was conducted to study the semi‐continuous emulsion copolymerization of styrene (St)/butyl acrylate (BA) with methacrylic acid (MAA). The effects of St/BA ratio, MAA content, and pH on the carboxylic acid distribution in the latex, the polymer glass transition temperature (Tg), the average latex particle diameter, the molecular weight and distribution of the polymer products, and the coating adhesion to a polycarbonate substrate were investigated. The experimental results showed how the pH affected the distribution of MAA in the polymer particles. Regression analysis revealed how the St/BA ratio, MAA content, and pH influence the copolymer Tg, the latex particle size, the number‐average molecular weight Mn as well as the weight‐average molecular weight Mw. An empirical model to correlate the pull‐off adhesion of the latex coating to a polycarbonate substrate was developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".