MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106523592 · doi:10.1177/0267659106074764

Comparison of two different extracorporeal circuits on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass in children

2006· article· en· W2106523592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerfusion · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMedicineCardiopulmonary bypassExtracorporealOxygenatorCardiac surgeryExtracorporeal circulationAnesthesiaMiddle cerebral arteryCardiologySurgeryIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of two different extracorporeal circuits on the counts of high-intensity transient signals (HITS) during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Transcranial Doppler was used to detect HITS associated with extracorporeal sources during the period of aortic crossclamping in the middle cerebral artery of children undergoing CPB. Based on body size, children were assigned one of two extracorporeal circuits (A or B). Circuit A included a D-705 oxygenator and associated reservoir, and circuit B included a Lilliput oxygenator and reservoir. Patients were further classified into two groups according to the complexity of surgical repair: single simple lesions or multiple complex lesions. RESULTS: We studied 109 pediatric patients. Surgery for multiple complex lesions was associated with longer periods of aortic crossclamping and CPB (p < 0.0001). The median count of extracorporeal HITS was 12 (25th, 75th percentiles: 3, 51). The type of extracorporeal circuit (p = 0.012) and the complexity of surgical repair (p < 0.0001) had an effect on the HITS counts. The use of circuit A was associated with higher HITS counts during surgery for multiple complex lesions compared to single simple lesions (p < 0.0001). Conversely, no differences were found with the use of circuit B between these two surgical groups (p > 0.25). During surgery for multiple complex lesions, patients treated with circuit A showed higher HITS counts than those with circuit B (p < 0.01), but there were no circuit-related differences in HITS counts (p = 0.30) during single simple lesions. CONCLUSION: Variations in the design characteristics of extracorporeal circuits can increase cerebral emboli during CPB in children. This may be related to the reduced ability of some circuits to remove emboli during long periods of CPB for complex congenital heart-surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it