Design and Synthesis of Urea‐Linked Aromatic Oligomers—A Route Towards Convoluted Foldamers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Herein we report the design and synthesis of crescent-shaped and helical urea-based foldamers, the curvature of which is controlled by varying the constituent building blocks and their connectivity. These oligomers are comprised of two, three or five alternating aromatic heterocycles (pyridazine, pyrimidine or pyrazine) and methyl-substituted aromatic carbocycles (tolyl, o-xylyl or m-xylyl) connected together through urea linkages. A crescent-shaped conformational preference is encoded within these pi-conjugated urea-linked oligomers based on intramolecular hydrogen bonding and steric interactions; the degree of curvature is tuned by the urea connectivity to the heterocycles and the aryl groups. NMR characterization of these foldamers confirms the intramolecular hydrogen-bonded conformation expected (Z,E configuration of the urea bond) in both the pyridazyl and pyrimidyl foldamers in solution. An X-ray crystal structure of the N(3),N(6)-diisobutylpyridazine-4,6-diamine-o-tolyl urea-linked foldamer (4) confirms the presence of N-H...N hydrogen bonds between the heterocyclic nitrogen atom and the free hydrogen of the urea linkage. Additionally, the tolyl methyl group interacts unfavourably with the urea carbonyl oxygen, thus destabilising the alternate planar conformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".