MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106570749 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32064

A child with deletion (14)(q24.3q32.13) and auditory neuropathy

2007· article· en· W2106570749 on OpenAlexaff
Kamilla Schlade‐Bartusiak, Georgina MacIntyre, Janice Zunich, Diane W. Cox

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaploinsufficiencyAuditory neuropathyHearing lossPhenotypeGeneticsChromosomeGeneBiologyChromosomal regionLoss functionAbnormalityMedicineAudiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An interstitial deletion in the middle and distal part of chromosome 14 is a rare chromosomal abnormality characterized by a wide spectrum of phenotypic manifestations. We present a patient with a nearly 20 Mb interstitial deletion of chromosome 14q24.3q32.13 determined by FISH, that is associated with minor dysmorphic features, developmental delay, absent speech and auditory neuropathy. The deleted region contains 130 known genes, among them 48 with reported function or association with human disease. The patient's phenotype is compared with interstitial deletions of the distal part of chromosome 14 reported previously. We hypothesize, that there is (are) a gene (genes) in the 14q32.11-q32.13 that is (are) important for the hearing process and for which haploinsufficiency can cause auditory neuropathy. Several genes in the region, among them calmodulin, chromogranin A, the goosecoid and FOXN3, can contribute to the observed phenotype. Detailed mapping in additional patients with 14q32 deletions and hearing loss could further define the candidate region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207