MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2106572546 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1995.579564

A monolithic miniaturized programmable implant for neuromuscular stimulation

2002· article· en· W2106572546 on OpenAlexaff
K. Arabi, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestabilityImplantStimulationComputer scienceSpinal cord stimulationNeuroprostheticsElectronic engineeringBiomedical engineeringEmbedded systemComputer hardwareElectrical engineeringEngineeringMedicineReliability engineeringPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents a new implantable microstimulator system for neuromuscular stimulation. The implantable circuitry is externally controlled and powered by a single encoded radio frequency carrier and may have up to 16 independently controlled bipolar channels. The implant system is adaptable to the patient's needs and to future development in stimulation algorithms, without changing the implant. The microstimulator is able to generate a wide range of stimulation patterns including selective stimulation waveforms. An optical telemetry link transmits the state of patient to the external controller. The chip has been designed for structural testability and uses circuit techniques to reduce power consumption and insure long-term stability. The implantable system can be used to any neuromuscular applications. If is intended to restore normal bladder functions (retention and incontinence) to spinal cord injured (SCI) patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies→French-language works237,207→