A method for detection of atrial fibrillation using RR intervals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work describes a method for automatic detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) based on RR intervals. We define /spl Delta/RR to be the difference between successive RR intervals. The standard density histograms of RR and /spl Delta/RR intervals are determined from data in the MIT-BIH atrial fibrillation/flutter database. The present method estimates the similarity between the standard density histograms and a best density histogram by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test. The algorithm returns significance (p) of difference between given histograms. If the p value is smaller than a value (P/sub c/), the test density histogram is significantly different from the standard density histogram. If the test density histogram is not significantly different from the standard density histogram, we say the data is AF: Using the standard density histogram of /spl Delta/RR with P/sub c/=0.01, the average sensitivity is 93.2% and the average specificity is 96.7%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it