IDENTIFICATION AND EXPRESSION ANALYSIS OF TWO ARABIDOPSIS LRR-PROTEIN ENCODING GENES RESPONSIVE TO SOME ABIOTIC STRESSES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two Arabidopsis thaliana genes, psr9.2 and psr9.4 appeared to be highly similar to a phosphate-starved induced gene, psr9, isolated from Brassica nigra suspension cells. Sequence analysis classified the encoded polypeptides as members of leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins superfamily. The sequence of psr9 proteins comprise a unique N-terminal region encompassing a coiled-coil structure proceeding eleven LRRs along the C-terminal. Expression pattern analysis showed the responsiveness of these genes to various environmental conditions. Although both psr9 genes, psr9.2 and psr9.4, are expressed throughout the plant, the expression of psr9.2 was higher in the root whereas psr9.4 expression was prominent in the shoot. The expression levels were increased proportional to the duration of phosphate deprivation treatment. Plants exposed to cold temperature expressed both genes at high levels in both roots and shoots. In contrast, heat shock increased the expression levels of both genes in the shoots while reducing it in roots. High-salt treatment upregulated the expression of psr9 genes only in the roots. These data may suggest distinct roles for psr9 genes during plant response to various envi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".