XML Agents Technology for Building Collaborative Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes an XML based agents technology for building web services based collaborative applications. The technology consists of XML Agents (XAs), XML Agent Hosts, and XML based Agent Communication Language (XACL). The XML based XAs and XACL messages are neutral to particular agent systems and programming languages. The XML Agent Hosts are implemented using Web Services technology. The hosts provide services to XML agents and agent communications that are represented as Web service requests, and provide runtime environments for performing visiting agents’ behaviors that are implemented in multiple programming languages. Collaborative applications can be built using two types of agent collaborations, agent communications through XACL and agent visiting. XAs reside in different hosts can collaborate each other be exchanging XACL messages. Also XAs can "meet" face to face in a host supported by XAs’ mobility. Mobile XAs support more dynamic collaborations by their dynamic behaviors with different collaboration partners in different hosts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it