MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106703106 · doi:10.1086/315801

Intranasal Immunization with Gonococcal Outer Membrane Preparations Reduces the Duration of Vaginal Colonization of Mice by<i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i>

2000· article· en· W2106703106 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Plante, Ann E. Jerse, Josée Hamel, France Couture, Clément R. Rioux, Bernard R. Brodeur, Denis Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNasal administrationImmunizationVaginaImmune systemMicrobiologyMedicineGonorrheaColonizationImmunologyNeisseriaceaeBiologyAntibioticsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nasal immunization was studied to determine if it could elicit an immune response capable of preventing vaginal colonization by Neisseria gonorrhoeae or of reducing its duration in the estradiol-treated mouse model. Nasal administration of gonococcal outer membrane (OM) preparations induced the development of systemic and vaginal immune responses that were directed mainly against a limited number of gonococcal OM proteins. The impact of nasal immunization on vaginal colonization by N. gonorrhoeae was evaluated by use of an experimental model, in which mice were treated with estradiol to prolong the infection. Bacterial clearance was significantly faster for mice immunized intranasally with N. gonorrhoeae OM preparations (4.0+/-2.5 days) than for control mice (8.5+/-4.3 days). The estradiol-treated mouse model may serve as a useful tool for the evaluation of potential gonococcal vaccine candidates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207