MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106714547 · doi:10.2202/1948-4682.1006

Current Global Trends in Medical Professionalism

2009· article· en· W2106714547 on OpenAlex
Jeff Blackmer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Medical & Health Policy · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare cost, quality, practices
Canadian institutionsCanadian Medical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical carePolitical sciencePublic relationsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Medical professionalism is a complex topic which must include a consideration of both individual and collective physicians, societal and patient rights and obligations. While attempting to propose a definition which might capture the various aspects of this issue, this paper also examines current global trends in medical professionalism such as care during a pandemic, professionally‐led regulation, conflict of interest, and conscientious objection. All of these are issues that are often dealt with on a systemic level as a medical collective but they also have a real and lasting impact at the individual physician level. While much of the attention in medical professionalism is paid to the individual practitioner, there is also an important role to be played in policy development, and national and international advocacy efforts by physician organizations such as the World Medical Association and others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.578
GPT teacher head0.683
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it